| Voice of Pudukkottai
: C.A. Anthony

Pudukkottai
District
Area, Population & Sex Ratio
Geographical Area : 4651.0 Km2
Population in Pudukkottai (Census 2011)
Total Population
Total : 1618725
Male : 803337
Female : 815388
Disabled population
Total disabled population : 40289
In seeing : 24802
In speech : 3286
In hearing : 1818
In movement : 7710
Mental : 2673
Rank ( VoiceOfBharat.org Analysis
)
Backwardness : 217
Sex Ratio Rank : 540
(Rank one is least sex ratio - Cenus 2001)
HIV Category District : A
(HIV Sentinel Surveillance 2004 - 2006)
Disability : 218 (Census 2001)
Literacy Ratio : 180 (Census 2001)
Minority : Does not figure in MCD
Water : Flouride in Groundwater above permissible limits

Brief About Pudukkottai District
Pudukkottai District was carved out of Tiruchirappalli
and Thanjavur districts in January 1974. The district
has an area of 4663 Sq. Km. with a coast line of 39 Kms.
The district lies between 78.25' and 79.15' of the Eastern Longitude
and between 9.50' and 10.40' of the Northern Latitude.
It is bounded by Tiruchirappalli district in the North and West,
Sivaganga district in the South, Bay of Bengal in
the East and Thanjavur district in the North East.
History
Pudukkottai
was organised as a separate district, on 14th January 1974, comprising
the former Pudukkottai Division of Tiruchirappalli district with
some additions from Thanjavur district. At present, this district
is composed of two Revenue Divisions, namely, Pudukkottai and Aranthangi
and nine Taluks, namely, Kulathur, Illuppur, Alangudi, Pudukkottai,
Gandarvakottai, Thirumayam, Aranthangi, Avudaiyrakoil and Manamelkudi.
There are 765 Revenue Villages. The area of the district is
4663 Sq.Kms. The population of the district is 14,52,269 (as per
Census 2001 Provisional figures). The district depends a great
deal on the monsoon for its water supply.Many
of the villages are of ancient foundation. The district was
one of the homes of pre-historic man. A very large number
of burial sites found in the northern and western parts of the district
attest this fact. A
very brief sketch of political history is given here in order to
appreciate and understand the mixed legacy of antiquities, monuments,
epigraphs and the like. The history of Pudukkottai is an epitome
of the history of South India. In and around Pudukkottai,
there are many vestiges of the oldest habitations
of man and some of the lithic records known in the south.
The Pandyas, Cholas, Pallavas, Haysalas, Vijaynagar and Madurai
Nayaks ruled over this part of the country and fostered it's communual
organisations, trade and industries and embellished it with temples
and monuments of outstanding merit. Sangam
Tamil literatures mention some place names of the district.
Oliyamangalam (Thirumayam Taluk) is called as Ollaiyur in Purananuru.
It was the birth place of poet Ollaiyur Kilan Makan Perumchattan
and Ollaiyur Thantha Budha Pandyan. Agananuru
also mentions Ollaiyur. It seems to have been an important
city of the Pandyas. Four other places also find place in
the Sangam classics. They are Ambukkovil, the ancient Alumbil,
referred to in Agananuru; Avur the home of the poets Avurkilar, Avur
Mulamkilar; Erichi, the ancient Erichalur which had been identified
with Erichi Village in Pudukkottai - Aranthangi road (But according
to recent researches a village near Illupur). It was probably
the home of the poet Madalan Madurai Kumaranar. Avayapatti
is traditionally associated with Avvaiyar, who is believed to have
lived here for some time.This district was
under the Pandyas of the first empire during Sangam period, but
some part of it's northern boundary had been under the influence
of the Cholas of Uraiyur, since a few villages here bear the prefix
like "killi" and "valavan" both of which are the titles of the Cholas.
The
district shares the large prosperity of the maritime trade of the
Tamils, Karukkakurichi, the place of find of a treasure trove of
more than 500 Imperial Roman Gold and Silver Coins, the largest
ever recorded from a single hoard deserves notice in the context
of the early history of the district. This place lies in Alangudi
taluk, with in a short distance north of Aranthangi and the adjoining
old ports of Mimisal and Saliyur in the same area and Tondi further
south. The site of find would mark an important Indo-Roman
trading centre, through which the inland trade route ran between
the western and eastern ports during that time. This
is indicated by a chain of such Roman coin hoard sites such as Korkai,
Kilakkarai, Alagankulam all on the eastern sea coast. While
Karukkakuruchi is a bit inland but not far away from port like Mimisal.
There are also few other sites of such finds in the east coast.
These, while pointing out the exchanges of the exportable products
for Roman gold and silver currency would also indicate the places
mentioned to have been active trade centres. The Karukkakurichi
hoard contained the issues of the Roman emperors and their queens,
successively from Augustus(BC 29 - AD 14) upto Vaspasianus (69-79
AD).From about the end of fourth century about
the last quarter of sixth, the district, like many other parts of
Tamil Nadu was under the Kalabhras. It must have come under the
King Kurran, inscription of whom has been found in Pulankurichi
near Ponnamaravathi in the district. The next
phase in the history of the district, follows the overthrow of Kalabharas
by Kadungon in Pandya country about 590 AD. The first Pandya
empire inaugurated by Kadungon spread in to the district.
This is shown by the presence of inscription of the rulers of this
dynasty in Kudumianmalai, Thirugokarnam and Sittannavasal.
The poem, Pandimandala sathakam states that Pandya land's
northern frontier was river Vellar. The Vellar that flows north
of Pudukkottai town has been from the ancient times was the traditional
boundary separating the terrains of the Cholas and Pandyas.
This dividing line formed the Konadu and Kanadu, on the north and
south respectively. Thus the district became a kind of
marchar land between the Pandyas and Pallavas. The Pandyas
and Pallavas carried on the wars by proxy through their subordinate
chiefs the Mutharayars and Velirs. Among the Velirs
the most well known are the Irukkuvels of Kodumbalur. The
Kodumbalur Velirs located in the political buffer zone between the
kingdoms of the Cholas and Pandyas and formed the family of nobility
from which kings and other chiefs made matrimonial alliance. The
period of three centuries between C 600 and C 900 AD relates to
the reign of the Pallavas of Kanchi and Pandyas of Madurai who ruled
over the entire Tamila Nadu with their boundary in between their
empires oscillating on either side of river Kaveri the bone of contention
being Cholamandalam the home of Cholas and the fertile Kaveri delta
that was the granary of the south and as such always been the cynosure
of all powers contending for supermacy during the entire historical
period. The Cholas themselves were in eclipse and hibernating
only to revive again in the ninth century, when the Pallava power
came to an end, the Pandyas were holding on for some more time to
yield place ultimately to the waxing Chola power.Though
Mahendravarma Pallava (604-630 A.D) inherited the Pallava empire
from his victorious father Simhavishnu that reached up to the bank
of the Cauvery, Cholamandalam could not be retained by his immediate
successor, as it was over-run by the Pandyas of the further south.
The tract north and south of river Vellar were in the hands of the
Mutharayar chieftains who till their annihilation by the resurgent
Chola line of Vijayalaya, were owing alternate allegiance to the
super powers. The Irukkuvelirs, at the end became the firm
allies of the Cholas.Thus, one cannot expect
to find early Pallava monuments, antiquities and inscriptions in
Pudukkottai region but only those of the contemporary Pandyas along
with those of Mutharaiyars and Irukkuvelirs. Later Pallavas
wrested the tract from the hands of the Pandyas. The tract
come under the Pallavas from the time of Nandhivarman-II (730-796
AD) when the Pallavas power reasserted itself in Cholamandalam and
the tract south of Kaveri, reaching a little south beyond Vellar,
comprising the northern half of the Pudukkottai district.
This period is thus marked by the presence of rock cut cave temples
of the Pandyas and Mutharaiyars.The available
historical evidence under the first Pandya empire is rather scanty.
The best known is the inscription at Sittannavasal in the reign
of Srimara Srivallaba (851-862 AD) and at Kudumianmalai in the reign
of Kochadayan Ranadheeran or Sadayan Maran (C 700-730 AD).
In the reign of Maravarman Rajasimha-I (C 730-760 AD) a number of
battles were faught against the Pallavas, one of the sites was Kodumbalur.
The inscription of the reign of Nedunchadayan, (C 768-816 AD) the
greatest king of the dynasty is found in Thirugokarnam and Nirpalani.
Of the reign of three successors of Srimara Srivallaba ending with
Rajasimha-II (C 920 AD) who lost his kingdom to the resurgent
Cholas, there are no reference about the Pandya rulers in the district.
The Pallava references to places and
incidents in the district are equally scanty. The earliest reference
of the historical events in the district find place in the Pandya
records of Velvikudi and Sinnamanur plates which say that Maravarman
Rajasimha defeated Nadhivarman Pallava Malla at Kodumbalur.
The inscriptions of his successors are found in Kunnandarkoil, Malayadipatti
and Rasalipatti.The age of Pallavas and Pandyas
of the first empire, the Mutharaiyars and Irukkuvelirs was the age
of Tamil Bhakthi Movement. The Thevaram mentions several temples
in the district. The three Nayanmars from this district were,
Idangalinayanar of Kodumbalur, Perumizhalai Kurumbanayanar associated
with Devarmalai and Kulachirai Nayanar of Manamelgudi.Jainism
well flourished in Pudukkottai area up to 11th century. There are
a number of Jaina vestiges in the district. The
Buddhist vestiges in the district come from the former Thanjavur
district. Buddha idols are found at Kottaipattinam and Karur.With
the exit of Pallavas from the political scene and the subsequent
elimination of the Pandya power by the Cholas who established themselves
at Thanjavur as their capital at the close of 9th century.
By 11th century they extended their sway even beyond, Tamilakam.
Pudukkottai among many other places come under them.
Their rule extended till about the middle of 13th century when the
Pandyas staged a comeback.Under Chola Vijayalaya,
this district formed part of his dominion but perhaps fitfully.
The notion that some temples of nineth century in the district,
belong to early Chola period, is erroneous. The Pandyas still
held power in the region. It was not until the reign of Parantaka-I
(907-955 AD). Vijayalay's second successor, that the Cholas conquered
the entire Pandya land. The Kodumbalur chiefs helped Parantaka
in his campaign and remained faithful to the Cholas thereafter.The
rule of Rajaraja-I shows a brilliant part in the history of the
district in common with that of Tamil Nadu. The full benefaction
of the Chola rule is revealed in their inscriptions in the district.
These inscriptions are of great value is showing how effectively
local administration functioned in this part of Chola Kingdom.
Rajaraja-I appointed his son the viceroy of
the conquered Pandya and Chera lands. The entire district
formed part of the Chola kingdom until the last year of Kulothunga-III
(1178-1218 AD). At the death of Rajaraja-II and the succession
of Rajadhiraja-II, the Chola power began to decline. The
Pandyas began to assert their independence from the time of Kulothunga-I.
Towards the end of the reign of Raja Raja-II, Kulasekara one of
the two contenders for Pandya throne pealed the Chola for help.
His rival Parakrama turned towards Srilanka. Pudukkottai
also become seat this civil war. Parakrama Babu the Srilanka
king sent an army to assist Parakrama Pandya according to Culavamsa,
the Sinhalese chornicle the Sinhalese army engaged itself
in the war in the parts of the district and burnt down the three
storeyed palace at Ponnamaravathi. The outcome of the civil
war became disastrous to the Cholas.The history
of the district after the fall of Cholas could not be told in detail
for the records are comparatively minimal.. The Pandyas of
the second empire spread their influence in the district gradually.
The Pandya power reached its height in the
district under Jatavarman Sundra Pandya-I and Jatavaraman vira Pandya-I
the joint rulers. The inscription of Virapandya in Kudumianmalai,
throws much light on his relationship with Srilanka and his kingdom
across the seas. During the reign of Maravarman Kulasekara-I
who acceded in 1268 A.D, Marcopolo the Venetian traveler visited
Pandya country. Towards the end of Kulasekara's reign
Jatavarman Virapandya-II and Jatavarman Sundara Pandya-II, the brothers
quarreled. This led to a civil war in Pandya country resulting
in political unrest and confusion. Malikafur
the general of Alaudeen Khalji the Sultan of Delhi took
advantage of this and invaded Pandya country. This led to the incorporation
of the Pandya country in the Delhi empire in subsequent years.
A sultanate was established at Madurai. There are two
inscriptions relating to the period of the Sultans of Madurai in
the district, one at Rangiam (1332 AD) and another at Panaiyur (1344
A.D). The brief spell of Muslim rule (Sultanate
of Madurai) at Madurai lasted for about 75 years and again there
was political unrest and chaos and Pudukkottai region also shared
the fate. Minor princes ruled small territories here and
there. By about 1371 AD. Kumarakampana, the Vijayanagar prince
took over Madurai and the Sultanate came to an end. But the
Pandya power did not survive on the Hindu conquest and slowly it
ceased to be a historical force in the district.The
Hoysalas of Karnataka arrived in the southern part of Tamil Nadu
and actively intervened Chola - Pandya feuds and soon they came
to occupy the region on either banks of river Cauvery with the capital
at Kannanur (modern Samayapuram). They established themselves
in the area by the middle of 13th century and much of the Pudukkottai
area was under their sway till the end of 13th century.The
Vijayanagar Rayas centered in Hampi took over Madurai, from the
Muslims when the whole of southern Karnataka, Andra and Tamilnadu
came under one rule - the Vijayanagar empire.Under
the Vijayanagar Sangama dynasty (1336-1485 A.D) the inscriptions
in the district refer to many local chiefs such as Suraikudi, Perambur,
Sendavanmangalam, Vanadaraiyar, Gangaiaraiyar and Thondaimans of
Aranthangi. During the brief Suluva rule (1485-1505 A.D) Narasimha
Raya the first Suluva emperor, during a tour of his dominions passed
through Pudukkottai country on his way to Madurai. Vira Narasimha
Nayak, the Tuluva usurper and the general of Saluva Narasimha-I,
led a campign against the Pandya chiefs and marched through Pudukkottai.A
great Personality of the Tuluva dynasty (1505-1570 A.D) was Krishna
Deveraya (1509-1529 A.D). He had visited Brahadamba Gokarnesa temple
at Thirugokarnam on his way to Rameswaram and gifted many valuable
presents to the temple. Under his successor eastern
part of Pudukkottai district formed part of the Thanjavur kingdom
for some time and the rest was under the Madurai Nayaks. The
Thondaimans of Pudukkottai rose to power by about the end of 17th
century.The provincial viceroys of the Vijayanagar
empire, the Nayaks of Madurai and Thanjavur asserted independence
after the downfall of the empire. The Pudukkottai area thus
came under the Nayaks of Madurai nominally and under the Thanjavur
Nayaks frequently.The Thondaimans of Pudukkottai
came to rule with full sovereignty over the Pudukkottai area from
the middle of the 17th century till it's amalgamation with the rest
of India after Indian Independence in 1947. The
ancestors of the Pudukkottai ruling line of Thondaimans, are migrants
from Thiruppathi region in the Thondaimandalam, the northern stretch
of the ancient Tamil Kingdom, along with the Vijaynagar army, which
was in engagement in this part of territory in the early 17th century.
It is probable that one among them got some lands assigned to him
by the local Pallavarayar chieftain and settled down at Karambakudi
and Ambukovil area, and became the chieftain of the area, later
came to be called as the progenitor of Thondaimans of Pudukkottai
ruling house. According to the legendary account found in
a Telugu poem, Thondaiman Vamasavali, the Thondaimans belonged to
Indravamsa and the first ruler was Pachai Thondaiman.Avadi
Raya Thondaiman, the successor of Pachai Thondaiman, with the favour
of Venkata Raya-III (1630-1642 A.D) the king of Vijayanagar got
extented the land in his possession in the region and he was also
conferred the title Raya. The Avadai Raya Thondaiman inherited
Vijayanagar tradition and the Thondaimans of later period adopted
it.His son Ragunatha Raya Thondaiman came
close to the Nayak of Thanjavur and Rangakrishna Muthuvirappa Nayak
of Tiruchirappalli. He was appointed as the arasu kavalar
of Tiruchirappalli. Vijaya Raghunatha Kilavan Sethupathi (1673-1710
A.D) the Sethupathi ruler of Ramanathapuram married Kathali Nachiar
the sister of Thondaiman. This marriage strengthened the ties between
these dynasties. The Sethupathi presented the tract of land
to the south of Vellar to the Thondaiman. Thus the Pudukkottai
territory was enlarged. This account is called the Sethupathi
origin of Pudukkottai country and expansion of Thondaiman rule.
the Thondaiman's rule was established south of Vellar and Raghunatha
Raya Thondaiman was in estimation to the status of a bigger territory
by about 1686 A.D., and he ruled up to 1730 A.D.About
the time that Raghunatha Raya Thondaiman became the ruler of Pudukkottai,
Namana Thondaiman, his brother became the chief of Kulathur Palayam
(present Kulathur taluk area) with the blessings of the Nayak king
Ranga Krishna Muthuvirappa of Tiruchirappalli (1682-1689 A.D) and
Kulathur continued as seperate "principality - with it's ruler known
as Kulathur Thondaiman " till about 1750 A.D when it was annexed
to Pudukkottai. Reghunatha also got some territories by victory,
consolidating Pudukkottai rule roughly constituting the former Kulathur,
Alangudi and Thirumayam taluks. The tract contained in these
taluks, later came to be known as Pudukkottai State (Pudukkottai
Samasthanam).Vijaya Raghunatha Raya Thondaiman
(1730-1769 A.D) was the second in the line of Thondaimans. During
his period the whole of India come under the umbrella of the
Mughals. The Nayakdoms of Ginjee, Thanjavur and Madurai were
subjugated and became tributaries of the Mughal rule so also the
smaller palayams which were under them. The Nizam of Hydrabad
was appointed as the Mughal representative of South India, in turn
the Nizam entrusted the Tamilnadu region then known as Carnatic,
to the Nawab of Arcot. Many of the tributory states did not
remit the tributes regularly and such provinces were invaded by
the Nawab's forces. Nothing like this happened in the case
of Pudukkottai and was left undisturbed by the Nawab. The
famous war of succession to the office of Nawab of Carnatic between
Mohamad Ali and Chanda Sahib, became in due course a war of supermacy
between the English and the French in South India which resulted
in the Carnatic wars. The French supported the cause of Chanda
Sahib and the English were on the side of Mohamed Ali. The
war lasted for many years mainly around Tiruchirappalli. The
Thondaiman was firmly on the side of the English at his time while
the rulers like Thanjavur Marathas wavered. At last the English
emerged as the masters of this land. This firm help of the
Thondaiman to the English was rewarded by the exemption of tribute
by the victorious Nawab and later this was continued by the English.The
Thondaiman's act of friendship towards English continued by the
next ruler Raya Raghunatha Thondaiman (1769-1789 A.D). Because of
this the Thondaiman had to encounter the strong forces of Hyder
Ali.
The next ruler Raja Vijaya
Reghunatha Raya Thondaiman (1807-1825 AD) was crowned when he was
a minor and the British Government appointed Major John Black Burn,
to undertake the management of the province of Pudukkottai.
Since he was the former Resident of Thanjavur he brought to Pudukkottai
a good deal of Thanjavur administration of Maratha mystique and
Marathi was the language of administration of Pudukkottai for about
seventy five years. Revenue and Judicial administration of
same method and complexity were introduced in Pudukkottai. A palace
with citadels and broad moat was constructed for the Thondaiman
(the old palace in the centre of the town). The town was planned
with straight roads bisecting each other in the four directions
of the palace and thus Black Burn laid the foundation for modern
town of Pudukkottai. (This palace, "The old palace" has disappeared
completely, we can see the remains of the high wall in a few places
in the vicinity of the present west main street and south main street
(Rajaveethi)).
Raghunatha
Thondaiman (1825 - 1839 A.D) was conferred with the title "His Excellency"
by the British Government. He planned in 1830 to bring the
Cauvery water to Pudukkottai through a new canal but could not succeed
due to paucity of funds. Raghunatha Thondaiman was succeeded
by his son Ramachandra Thondaiman (1839 - 1886).
His long
tenure of office was marked by extravagance and gross mismanagement.
An administrator Seshaia Sastri arrived at the
scene as Dewan in 1878 and carried out many reforms. Among
them was the remodelling of Pudukkottai town incorporating the principles
of town planning which were little followed in the country at that
time. The towering administrative office building in red
brick colour in Pudukkottai was constructed under the supervision
of Seshaiah Sastri. The Pudukkulam, the big lake in the town
was another creation of Seshaiah Sastri. Ramachandra Thondaiman
has renovated many temples in the State. He was succeeded
by Marathanda Bhairava Thondaiman. Marthanda
Bhairava Thondaiman (1886-1929) became the ruler of the state at
the age of 11. The administration was looked after by a council
with the approval of the British Government. He toured in
Europe extensively. He married an Australian lady. A
son was born to him though this marriage (later known as Sydny Marthanda).
But his succession was opposed by the public. The British
administration also refused to recognise the marriage. Hence
the Raja abdicated his throne and settled in Paris and died
in 1928 and cremated at London.Raja Rajagopala
Thondaiman (1928 -1948) the last and ninth in the line of Thondaiman
rulers, was selected by the British Government and was crowned
when he was six years old. The administration was looked
after by English administrators, among them Alexandar Totenham was
noteworthy. The important architectural contribution of this
period is the New Palace - which was built in 1930 in Indo - Serasenic
Dravidian architecture. This beautiful granite structure
now houses the District Collector's Office. After Indian
independence in 1947, the Pudukkottai Princely State was amalgamated
with Indian Union on 04/03/1948 and became a division in Tiruchirappalli
district. The long history of the Thondaimans rule came to an end.
Such a brief historical sketch covering a
period of time of over two millennia will beside acquainting one
with the political forces and trends of the area located at the
centre of Tamil Nadu, will help to appreciate the nature, variety,
origin chronology and importance of the monuments their inscriptions
architecture, sculptures iconography and other aesthetic contents.
Geographical Position
Pudukkottai District was formed on 14.1.1974.
The total area of the district is 4663.2 sq.km (466329 Ha). The District is bound on the North and
North West by Tiruchiappalli District, West and South West by Sivaganga
District, on the East and North East by Thanjvaur District and on
the South East by Bay of Bengal. Pudukkottai District is situated in
between latitude 9o50 ‘ and 10o40’
and longitude 78o25’ and 79o15’
. It is almost a Coastal District.
The Western portion is 600 feet above M.S.L. tapers towards
the East and reaches the Sea level.
The land slope almost gentle except slight undulation particularly
in Ponnamaravathy area . There are no big hills except Narthamalai
hillock in Annavasal block and Piranmalai foot hills in Ponnamaravathy
block.
|