Change
Corruption on VoiceOfBharat.org
Districts

Corruption
Introduction
Central Government
Statistics
Legal

Voices
Jayprakash Narayan

 
 
Corruption

Corruption can be defined as use of governmental power for private gain.

There are two kinds of corruption: Extortionary Corruption and Collusive Corruption.

Extortionary Corruption can be defined as corruption where money has to be paid to acquire services that are legitimately due and honestly entitled.

Collusive Corruption implies bribe given or bribe taken to give something that is not legitimately due and here the bribe taker and bribe give, collude to transact a resource, that honest means would not have entitled.

Corruption can also be categorized as: Political Corruption and Retail Corruption.

Political corruption is corruption by elected representatives.

Retail Corruption is corruption by government officials.

Often corruption in India is accepted. However there is a cost to corruption.

India’s growth rate could be higher by 2% if India’s corruption level is contained. So if corruption is not contained India’s GDP could be half in 3 decades.

It is difficult to estimate the quantum of corruption in India. But in a GDP of national economy of Rs. 60 lakh crores, almost 3 lakh crores – 5 lakh crores is routed through corruption. Thus almost 5% of GDP is routed through corruption.

The World Bank estimates that almost 5% of global GDP is lost due to corruption around the world and this may be as high as 25% in some African countries.

If these estimates seem a little high, consider this there are 4 million trucks. Each truck has to pay Rs. 200 a day. Thus almost Rs. 100 crore a day or Rs. 35000 crore a year is routed through corruption only in truck sector.

Consider registration of housing, one has to pay amount equal to registration fees for corruption and this may amount to as much as 1% of cost of housing. Thus real estate sector could significantly add to corruption.

Enterprises have to pay some amount, even when paying appropriate legitimate taxes. Thus even to do legitimate dealing, one has to pay an illegal component.

These are examples of retail corruption. But there is considerable, political corruption too. Expenditure on elections is huge. While there is expenditure limit of Rs. 25 lakh on Parliamentary elections and Rs. 10 lakh on Assembly elections, it is reasonable to estimate that these expenditure limits are exceeded by 10-100 times, depending upon the state and nature of constituency.

Clearly politicians spending huge amount of money in election, will want to get a good rate of return. C K Prahalad, the late management guru estimated that almost Rs. 2.5 lakh crore is earned by politicians over a 5 year term. This calculation stems from an estimate that almost Rs. 8000 crore is spent on Union Parliamentary elections by political parties. If assembly elections are included, the expenditure could easily exceed Rs. 25000 crore. Clearly for this kind of ‘investment’ a return of at least 10 times would be expected. Hence it is not unreasonable to estimate that almost Rs. 2.5 lakh crores is earned by politicians over 5 year period. That would mean almost Rs. 50,000 crore per annum.

Thus out of total corruption of Rs. 3 lakh crore, anywhere between Rs. 50,000 crores to Rs. 75,000 crores(including local government corruption) is political corruption and almost 80% of corruption is retail corruption. Thus though political corruption attracts most attention, retail corruption cannot be neglected as it almost forms 70-80% of all corruption. Indeed while there are mere 5000 politicians there are almost 20 million government employees.

Election expenditure, that are in excess of ceiling limit are usually indulged in to buy votes, through enticement. Some people estimate that almost 20-60% of votes are bought by politicians by providing liquor or giving cash of some goods. Most poor class votes or even lower middle class votes are purchased. Voters may even take money from multiple candidates.

Since Indian elections operate on principle of first past the post system, every single vote is invaluable. And hence politicians are willing to spend huge amount of money to acquire the marginal vote because it is so valuable.

Indeed the political class presumes, that while spending on elections does not ensure victory, not spending on election almost certainly guarantees loss. Considering the enormous importance of money in elections, political parties are compelled to field candidate with money spending power and hence by definition, politicians, who are more likely than not likely to be corrupt.

However, very few, if any people, much less politicians are punished for corruption. Indeed not a single politician has been jailed for prolonged period for corruption, though it is realistic to presume that a very large percentage of politicians are corrupt. There is also very scant and not strong enough action against retail corruption. Hence both retail corruption and political corruption continue to thrive unchecked by law.

Challenges.

There are several challenges in checking corruption such as

1. Lack of strict enforcement and strong punitive action.
2. Weak enforcement of law.
3. Tolerance of corruption

What should corporates do?
Corporates should realize that corruption is not merely moral issue but actually an economic one. Corporates should at least pay due taxes. Corporates should use international instruments to check corruption in the nation.

What should common people do?
Common people should use RTI to expose corruption. With informed collective assertion, common people can over years transform the extent of corruption in India. Common people should elect clean politicians.